Citroen C3 Picasso 2015 vs Citroen C3 2013
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 28 HP more power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 89 NM more than Citroen C3. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 Picasso could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Opel Combo, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C3 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is larger. Citroen C3 Picasso is 16 cm longer than the Citroen C3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C3 Picasso has 85 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen C3, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`511 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Citroen C3 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen C3 Picasso, so Citroen C3 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |