Citroen C3 Picasso 2012 vs Renault Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 LPG | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 35 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 57 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C3 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 33 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 460 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C3 Picasso is 17 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 437 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Citroen C3 Picasso has 52 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 331 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`747 | 1`837 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 Picasso has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |