Citroen C3 Picasso 2012 vs Ford Fusion 2005
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 LPG | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford Fusion, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Ford Fusion. Despite the higher power, Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 33 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 460 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Fusion gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is larger. Citroen C3 Picasso is 6 cm longer than the Ford Fusion, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | 1175 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C3 Picasso has 48 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fusion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Picasso (by 331 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Fusion. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`747 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Ford Fusion has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 Picasso has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford Fusion, so Ford Fusion quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |