Citroen C3 Picasso 2008 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 215 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 18 seconds | |
Citroen C3 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 22 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Citroen Nemo. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.5 | |
The Citroen C3 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1350 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
Citroen C3 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 3.96 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 2.02 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
Citroen C3 Picasso is 12 cm longer than the Citroen Nemo, 25 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 360 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | no data | |
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C3 Picasso has 25 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`771 | 1`700 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |