Citroen C3 Picasso 2009 vs Toyota Verso 2010

 
Citroen C3 Picasso
2009 - 2013
Toyota Verso
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 110 HP99 HP
Torque: 245 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds13.3 seconds
Citroen C3 Picasso is more dynamic to drive.
Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 11 HP more power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Toyota Verso. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.85.4
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km6.2 l/100km
The Citroen C3 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1040 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway870 km on highway
920 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Citroen C3 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 8 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 PicassoInstalled on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.08 m3.99 m
Width: 1.77 m1.70 m
Height: 1.67 m1.60 m
Citroen C3 Picasso is larger.
Citroen C3 Picasso is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Verso, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 385 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1506 litres623 litres
Despite its longer length, Citroen C3 Picasso has 45 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Verso. This could mean that the Citroen C3 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Picasso (by 883 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8071`515
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Toyota Verso has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 Picasso has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 38008200
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 Picasso has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Toyota Verso has
  • timing chain engine
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv