Citroen C3 Picasso 2009 vs Toyota Verso 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 11 HP more power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Toyota Verso. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C3 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C3 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Citroen C3 Picasso 2009 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C3 Picasso 2009 1.6 engine Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is larger. Citroen C3 Picasso is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Verso, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | 623 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Citroen C3 Picasso has 45 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Verso. This could mean that the Citroen C3 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Picasso (by 883 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`807 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 Picasso has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |