Citroen C3 Picasso 2009 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 245 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 18 seconds | |
Citroen C3 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 42 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Citroen Nemo. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 Picasso could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1210 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
920 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 2 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C3 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Citroen C3 Picasso 2009 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C3 Picasso 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 3.96 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 2.02 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
Citroen C3 Picasso is 12 cm longer than the Citroen Nemo, 25 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 360 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | no data | |
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C3 Picasso has 25 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`807 | 1`700 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |