Citroen C3 Picasso 2009 vs Opel Meriva 2006

 
Citroen C3 Picasso
2009 - 2013
Opel Meriva
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP180 HP
Torque: 160 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds8 seconds
Opel Meriva is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 60 HP less power than Opel Meriva, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Opel Meriva. Due to the lower power, Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.47.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.8 l/100km8.9 l/100km
The Citroen C3 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway820 km on highway
640 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption
Citroen C3 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.08 m4.04 m
Width: 1.77 m1.69 m
Height: 1.67 m1.62 m
Citroen C3 Picasso is larger.
Citroen C3 Picasso is 4 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 8 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 385 litres360 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1506 litres1410 litres
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage capacity.
Citroen C3 Picasso has 25 litres more trunk space than the Opel Meriva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Picasso (by 96 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Meriva.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7531`905
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Opel Meriva has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 Picasso has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Opel Meriva, so Opel Meriva quality is probably better
Average price (€): 36002400
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 Picasso has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Opel Meriva has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv