Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 5 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C3 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C3 Picasso is 33 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Citroen C3 Picasso has 152 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`769 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Citroen C3 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Citroen C3 Picasso, so Citroen C3 Picasso quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |