Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 2 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. Despite the higher power, Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 Picasso could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller, but higher. Citroen C3 Picasso is 24 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage space. Citroen C3 Picasso has 115 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 Picasso has serious deffects in 205 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |