Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 55 NM more than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C3 Picasso is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 Picasso could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C3 Picasso is 28 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Citroen C3 Picasso has 47 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 178 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 Picasso has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |