Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Ford C-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 17 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C3 Picasso is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 Picasso could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C3 Picasso is 28 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1506 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Citroen C3 Picasso has 47 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 178 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`795 kg | 1`915 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`436 kg | 1`390 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 359 kg | 525 kg | |
| Citroen C3 Picasso load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 46 procentiem less than Ford C-Max. Therefore, Ford C-Max is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 Picasso has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |