Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Dacia Dokker 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 37 HP more power than Dacia Dokker, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Dacia Dokker. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.5 | |
|
The Dacia Dokker is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 Picasso could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Dokker gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C3 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine Dacia Dokker 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Dokker 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.81 m | |
| Citroen C3 Picasso is 26 cm shorter than the Dacia Dokker, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 800 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | 3000 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage space. Citroen C3 Picasso has 415 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Dokker. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 1494 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.5 metres less than that of the Dacia Dokker, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`818 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Citroen C3 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Citroen C3 Picasso, so Citroen C3 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Dacia Dokker has
| |