Citroen C3 Picasso 2008 vs Ford Fusion 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 120 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 133 - 245 NM | 110 - 204 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 15.7 seconds | 10.9 - 15.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 6.4 | 4.4 - 7.7 | |
Citroen C3 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Fusion. On average, Citroen C3 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 4.02 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.53 m | |
Citroen C3 Picasso is larger. Citroen C3 Picasso is 6 cm longer than the Ford Fusion, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 14 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 337 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | 1175 litres | |
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C3 Picasso has 48 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fusion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Picasso (by 331 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Fusion. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`773 | ~ 1`626 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | high | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |