Citroen C3 Picasso 2008 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Citroen C3 Picasso is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Citroen Nemo is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 120 HP | 68 - 73 HP | |
Torque: | 133 - 245 NM | 118 - 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 15.7 seconds | 16.2 - 18 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 6.4 | 4.5 - 6.6 | |
Citroen C3 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Nemo. On average, Citroen C3 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 3.96 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
Citroen C3 Picasso is 12 cm longer than the Citroen Nemo, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 360 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | no data | |
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C3 Picasso has 25 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`773 | ~ 1`695 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |