Citroen C3 Aircross 2018 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 Aircross is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C3 Aircross engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mazda CX-3. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 Aircross reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.9 | |
|
The Citroen C3 Aircross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C3 Aircross consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 Aircross over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C3 Aircross gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C3 Aircross engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Insignia, Citroen C4 Cactus, Opel Crossland | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C3 Aircross might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Citroen C3 Aircross is smaller, but higher. Citroen C3 Aircross is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C3 Aircross is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1289 litres | 1260 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 Aircross has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C3 Aircross has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The Mazda CX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Aircross (by 29 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Aircross is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`855 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Aircross has
|
| |