Citroen C3 Aircross 2017 vs Mazda CX-3 2018

 
Citroen C3 Aircross
2017 - 2018
Mazda CX-3
2018 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.8 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 100 HP115 HP
Torque: 254 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds10.5 seconds
Mazda CX-3 is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen C3 Aircross engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Mazda CX-3. Due to the lower power, Citroen C3 Aircross reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.94.8
The Citroen C3 Aircross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen C3 Aircross consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that by driving the Citroen C3 Aircross over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres44 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1280 km on highway970 km on highway
Citroen C3 Aircross gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Mazda CX-3 2018: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km360'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4, Opel CrosslandUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C3 Aircross might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.15 m4.28 m
Width: 1.74 m1.77 m
Height: 1.60 m1.54 m
Citroen C3 Aircross is smaller, but higher.
Citroen C3 Aircross is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Aircross is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
520 litres1260 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C3 Aircross has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The Mazda CX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 740 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Aircross is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8251`823
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): no data18 600
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 Aircross has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mazda CX-3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv