Citroen C2 2004 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 143 NM | 152 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Volkswagen Lupo is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C2 and Volkswagen Lupo have the same engine power, but Citroen C2 torque is 9 NM less than Volkswagen Lupo. Citroen C2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C2 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that by driving the Citroen C2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C2 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 34 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
520 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.67 m | 3.53 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Citroen C2 is larger. Citroen C2 is 14 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 166 litres | 130 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
879 litres | 830 litres | |
Citroen C2 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C2 has 36 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 49 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`415 | 1`320 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |