Citroen C2 2004 vs Suzuki Swift 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 143 NM | 133 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Citroen C2 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C2 engine produces 23 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Thanks to more power Citroen C2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C2 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C2 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C2 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
520 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.67 m | 3.70 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
Citroen C2 is smaller. Citroen C2 is 3 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C2 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 166 litres | 213 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
879 litres | 562 litres | |
Citroen C2 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 317 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Citroen C2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`415 | 1`485 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |