Citroen C2 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Citroen C2 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C2 engine produces 30 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power Citroen C2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C2 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C2 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C2 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Citroen C2 is smaller. Citroen C2 is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C2 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 166 litres | 155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
879 litres | 760 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C2 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The Mitsubishi Colt may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 119 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`415 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |