Citroen C2 2005 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen C2 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C2 engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Lupo. Thanks to more power Citroen C2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C2 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that by driving the Citroen C2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C2 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 34 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen C2 is larger. Citroen C2 is 14 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
879 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Citroen C2 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C2 has 63 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo, which means Citroen C2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`380 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |