Citroen C2 2006 vs Renault Clio 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Citroen C2 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C2 engine produces 1 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Citroen C2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen C2 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Citroen C2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C2 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 206 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Citroen C2 is 14 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C2 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
879 litres | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Citroen C2 has 62 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 156 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Citroen C2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen C2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Citroen C2, so Citroen C2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |