Citroen C2 2008 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C2 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C2 engine produces 55 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Citroen C2 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C2 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C2 could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C2 consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Peugeot 206 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen C2 is larger. Citroen C2 is 26 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
879 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Citroen C2 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C2 has 54 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 128 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Citroen C2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`425 | 1`245 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |