Citroen C2 2008 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Citroen C2 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C2 engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Citroen C2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C2 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C2 could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C2 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen Berlingo | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen C2 is larger. Citroen C2 is 26 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
879 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Citroen C2 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C2 has 54 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 128 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`362 | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |