Citroen C2 2008 vs Nissan Micra 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 86 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C2 engine produces 18 HP less power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Citroen C2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.7 | |
The Citroen C2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C2 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Citroen C2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 46 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
1100 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.67 m | 3.73 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
Citroen C2 is smaller. Citroen C2 is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C2 is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 166 litres | 251 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
879 litres | no data | |
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Citroen C2 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`391 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1800 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |