Citroen C2 2008 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C2 engine produces 27 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Citroen C2 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.5 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C2 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Citroen C2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C2 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Citroen C2 is smaller. Citroen C2 is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C2 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 166 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
879 litres | 760 litres | |
| Citroen C2 has 54 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 119 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Citroen C2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`391 kg | 1`545 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`003 kg | 1`045 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 388 kg | 500 kg | |
| Citroen C2 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Colt. Therefore, Mitsubishi Colt is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |