Citroen C2 2008 vs Ford KA 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Ford KA is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C2 engine produces 7 HP less power than Ford KA, but torque is 15 NM more than Ford KA. Due to the lower power, Citroen C2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.5 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C2 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C2 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C2 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C2 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.51 m | |
| Citroen C2 is 5 cm longer than the Ford KA, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C2 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 166 litres | 224 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
879 litres | 710 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Citroen C2 has 58 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. This could mean that the Citroen C2 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 169 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford KA. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`391 | 1`415 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen C2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen C2, so Citroen C2 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Ford KA has
| |