Citroen C2 2003 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 - 125 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 150 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 14.4 seconds | 8.5 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 6.9 | 3.0 - 7.5 | |
|
Citroen C2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Lupo. On average, Citroen C2 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen C2 is larger. Citroen C2 is 14 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
879 litres | 860 litres | |
|
Citroen C2 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C2 has 63 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo, which means Citroen C2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`390 | ~ 1`368 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |