Citroen C2 2008 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 - 125 HP | 55 - 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 160 NM | 93 - 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 14.8 seconds | 14.2 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 6.9 | 3.8 - 4.2 | |
|
Citroen C2 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo. On average, Citroen C2 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen C2 is larger. Citroen C2 is 26 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
879 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Citroen C2 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C2 has 54 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 128 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Citroen C2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`386 | ~ 1`188 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |