Citroen C2 2008 vs Citroen C2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 - 125 HP | 61 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 160 NM | 94 - 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 14.8 seconds | 8.9 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 6.9 | 4.1 - 6.9 | |
|
Citroen C2 2008 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C2 2003. On average, Citroen C2 2008 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C2 2008 and Citroen C2 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
879 litres | 879 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C2 2008 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen C2 2003, which means Citroen C2 2008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`386 | ~ 1`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen C2 has
| |