Citroen C1 2008 vs Suzuki Splash 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen C1 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C1 engine produces 3 HP more power than Suzuki Splash, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Suzuki Splash. Thanks to more power Citroen C1 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C1 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash, which means that by driving the Citroen C1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C1 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Splash gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Splash engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Agila, Suzuki Alto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Citroen C1 is smaller. Citroen C1 is 28 cm shorter than the Suzuki Splash, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C1 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
712 litres | 1050 litres | |
|
Suzuki Splash has more luggage space. Citroen C1 has 39 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Splash (by 338 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C1 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`180 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Suzuki Splash has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C1 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Suzuki Splash, so Suzuki Splash quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C1 has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |