Citroen C1 2014 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
| Citroen C1 and Peugeot 2008 have the same engine power, but Citroen C1 torque is 2 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Citroen C1 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C1 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that by driving the Citroen C1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C1 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 2008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 2008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.47 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Citroen C1 is smaller. Citroen C1 is 69 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C1 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 196 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
780 litres | 1194 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Citroen C1 has 154 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 414 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C1 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 2008, which means Citroen C1 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`240 | 1`582 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Peugeot 2008 scores higher in safety tests. The Peugeot 2008 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Peugeot 2008 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C1 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Peugeot 2008, so Peugeot 2008 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C1 has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |