Citroen C1 2014 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C1 engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, but torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Citroen C1 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Space Star can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Space Star version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen C1 2014 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Citroen C1 is smaller. Citroen C1 is 36 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C1 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 196 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
780 litres | 912 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Citroen C1 has 39 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C1 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`240 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C1 has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |