Citroen C1 2014 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C1 engine produces 6 HP less power than Skoda Citigo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen C1 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C1 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that by driving the Citroen C1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C1 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen C1 2014 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen C1 is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C1 is 12 cm shorter than the Skoda Citigo, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 196 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
780 litres | 959 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Citroen C1 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Citigo (by 179 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C1 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`240 kg | 1`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 840 kg | 929 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 400 kg | 361 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Citigo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen C1, so Skoda Citigo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C1 has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |