Citroen C1 2014 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C1 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C1 engine produces 1 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Thanks to more power Citroen C1 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 4.2 | |
|
The Citroen C1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C1 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that by driving the Citroen C1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Space Star can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Space Star version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Citroen C1 is smaller. Citroen C1 is 36 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C1 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 196 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
780 litres | 912 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Citroen C1 has 39 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C1 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Citroen C1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`240 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C1 has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |