Citroen C1 2012 vs Nissan Micra 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 93 NM | 110 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C1 engine produces 12 HP less power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Citroen C1 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.4 | |
The Citroen C1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C1 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Citroen C1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 41 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.44 m | 3.78 m | |
Width: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
Citroen C1 is smaller. Citroen C1 is 34 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C1 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 265 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | no data | |
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Citroen C1 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C1 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`190 | 1`425 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C1 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 5400 | 6200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C1 has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |