Citroen C1 2006 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
| Citroen C1 engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota Aygo, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Citroen C1 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.3 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C1 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that by driving the Citroen C1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C1 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C1 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Peugeot 107 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C1 is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
712 litres | 751 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C1 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`235 | 1`245 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C1 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C1 has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |