Citroen C1 2008 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 8 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 4.6 | 4.8 - 6.8 | |
|
Citroen C1 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Citroen C1 is smaller. Citroen C1 is 38 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C1 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
712 litres | 400 litres | |
| Citroen C1 has 81 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C1 (by 312 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C1 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Citroen C1 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`180 | ~ 1`463 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C1 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |