Citroen C1 2012 vs Suzuki Alto 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 - 14.9 seconds | 14 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 4.5 | 4.4 - 5.2 | |
|
Citroen C1 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Alto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C1 is 6 cm shorter than the Suzuki Alto, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 129 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
712 litres | 774 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C1 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Citroen C1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`185 kg | ~ 1`250 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C1 scores higher in safety tests, but Suzuki Alto is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C1 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C1 has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |