Citroen C1 2012 vs Nissan Micra 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 110 - 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 - 14.9 seconds | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 4.5 | 4.1 - 5.4 | |
|
Citroen C1 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Citroen C1 is smaller. Citroen C1 is 34 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C1 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
712 litres | 1132 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Citroen C1 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 420 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C1 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`185 | ~ 1`454 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Micra scores higher in safety tests. The Citroen C1 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C1 has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |