Citroen C1 2014 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 82 HP | 71 - 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 116 NM | 88 - 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 15.2 seconds | 11.7 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 4.3 | 4.1 - 4.2 | |
|
Citroen C1 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Space Star can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Citroen C1 is smaller. Citroen C1 is 36 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C1 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 196 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
780 litres | 912 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Citroen C1 has 39 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C1 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Citroen C1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`240 kg | ~ 1`333 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 874 kg | ~ 853 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 366 kg | ~ 480 kg | |
| Citroen C1 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Therefore, Mitsubishi Space Star is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C1 has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |