Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C-Crosser is 2 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1742 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 38 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 56 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |