Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006

 
Citroen C-Crosser
2007 - 2012
Mitsubishi Outlander
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 156 HP140 HP
Torque: 380 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 secondsn/a seconds
Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 16 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data7.5
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
740 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.64 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.72 m1.72 m
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C-Crosser is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 441 litres541 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1686 litres1691 litres
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 100 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 5 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`4102`350
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 64003200
Pros and Cons: Citroen C-Crosser has
  • more power
Mitsubishi Outlander has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv