Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Citroen C-Crosser and Mitsubishi Outlander have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C-Crosser is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 774 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 184 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 441 litres | 774 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1691 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space (by 333 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`410 kg | 2`410 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`825 kg | 1`720 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 585 kg | 690 kg | |
| Citroen C-Crosser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Therefore, Mitsubishi Outlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |