Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2011

 
Citroen C-Crosser
2007 - 2012
Chevrolet Captiva
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 156 HP184 HP
Torque: 380 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9.7 seconds
Chevrolet Captiva is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 28 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. Due to the lower power, Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data6.4
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres65 litres
740 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.67 m
Width: 1.81 m1.85 m
Height: 1.72 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C-Crosser is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 1 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 184 litres97 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 184 litres97 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 441 litres477 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1686 litres1577 litres
In 7-seat version Citroen C-Crosser has more luggage space (by 87 litres). In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 36 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 109 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters12.3 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva.
Gross weight (kg): 2`4102`505
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 64006600
Pros and Cons:
    Chevrolet Captiva has
    • more power
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv