Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 23 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C-Crosser consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C-Crosser could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C-Crosser and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 184 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 441 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | no data | |
| In 5-seat version Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |