Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 166 HP | |
Torque: | 232 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Citroen C-Crosser is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 4 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.5 | |
Citroen C-Crosser consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Crosser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 19 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C-Crosser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.65 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
Citroen C-Crosser is 13 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 556 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 955 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 115 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 731 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`160 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |