Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 20 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C-Crosser consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C-Crosser could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is larger. Citroen C-Crosser is 36 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser has more luggage capacity. Citroen C-Crosser has 22 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 467 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |