Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Mazda CX-7 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 104 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C-Crosser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C-Crosser consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Crosser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C-Crosser consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C-Crosser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-7 2007: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C-Crosser is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 184 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 441 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 774 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mazda CX-7 has more luggage space (by 14 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 912 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`301 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |