Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 16 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen C-Crosser consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Crosser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C-Crosser consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is larger, but lower. Citroen C-Crosser is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 184 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 441 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1691 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space (by 100 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |