Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 28 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. Despite less power, Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C-Crosser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C-Crosser consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Crosser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C-Crosser consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C-Crosser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | Used also on Opel Antara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is smaller. Citroen C-Crosser is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 184 litres | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 441 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1577 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Citroen C-Crosser has more luggage space (by 87 litres). In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 36 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |